We're Hiring!
Take the next step in your career and work on diverse technology projects with cross-functional teams.
LEARN MORE
Mountain West Farm Bureau Insurance
office workers empowered by business technology solutions
BLOG
7
10
2019

Azure Functions and Logic Apps: Differences and When to Use Them

Last updated:
10.15.2020

Microsoft Azure offers native serverless computing features. Two of the most crucial to master are Azure Functions and Azure Logic Apps. Each of them help enable business logic that automates your Azure workflow, but they have key differences and in fact can be used together in a complementary manner to offer flexible, powerful control over your cloud resources.

Let’s take a closer look at how each of these serverless automation platforms work within Azure and some use cases for them.

Azure Functions execute code using your choice from a wide variety of common modern programming languages like C#, F#, Node.js, Java, and PHO. You pay only for the time your code runs or pay for an unlimited App Service plan based on reserved instances. Functions can integrate with your existing code libraries and Azure platforms, including triggering as part of an Azure Logic App.

Azure Logic Apps are configured within a web portal and can execute your logic without programming any code. This is more simple to administrate as you only need to manage the properties of these logic blocks in your workflow; but it is also less powerful as you can not get as customized or granular as with Functions. However many (over 200) connectors are plug-and-play so Logic Apps are hardly limited. You pay per action or trigger, plus storage.

Here is a chart describing some key differences between Logic Apps and Functions:

 

Azure Functions

Azure Log Apps

Use Cases for Azure Functions and Logic Apps

Because Functions are code-based, you can write, execute, and test them on your local workstation. Any debugging can take place without involving your production cloud environment or provisioning additional (potentially costly) test resources in the cloud. This is also more efficient for your developers.

As mentioned above, Functions also offer more flexibility due to their basis in powerful programming languages. They are also portable into and out of Azure. Some common scenarios for using Functions include:

Logic Apps are preferable when you don’t wish to leverage developer resources and instead use the GUI. They are better suited to integrations as many connectors are available out of the box. Therefore Logic Apps can reduce your time to market in an automation scenario. Some common uses for Logic Apps include:

Of course, mixing and matching between the two is likely to be the correct answer for large scale enterprise cloud environments. Indeed, nesting Functions within your apps might be the most efficient way for some workflows. It all comes down to experimentation and efficiency.

Recent Blog Posts

lunavi logo alternate white and yellow
11.19.2024
11
.
8
.
2024
Load & Performance Testing with Azure Load Testing Service

Learn about load and performance testing in Microsoft Azure.

Learn more
lunavi logo alternate white and yellow
10.8.2024
09
.
25
.
2024
Maximizing Business Efficiency with Azure DevOps

For enterprises looking to adopt or mature their DevOps practices, Azure DevOps offers unmatched flexibility, scalability, and depth.

Learn more
lunavi logo alternate white and yellow
10.8.2024
09
.
09
.
2024
Exploring Microsoft Fabric: A Comprehensive Overview

Discover how Microsoft Fabric transforms data management and analytics with powerful tools for real-time insights and seamless collaboration, driving smarter, faster business decisions.

Learn more